Welcome to this series

"The Mistakes of Modern Science"

(which intends to demonstrate that
the great names of science are fallible
and many of our so-called 'scientific' proofs are false.)

Once, it was the Church that protected Religion from Science, now it is Science that protects 'Science' from Science.

The premise of 'Modern Science' is that the Quantum World cannot be known
and can only be revealed by "going faster and faster"
as the Red Queen said in 'Alice Through the Looking Glass'

and where the expression "Down the Rabbit Hole" is now the axiom of the Quantum World.

Science may enjoy living in multiple parallel dimensions where particles can talk to their their twins immediately from across the galaxies and tenured professors can argue about black holes,

but,
with simple math demonstrated by a person with the name Miles Mathis(!),
the true hero (not the Mad Hatter or the loveable Mad Professor Einstein),

Science can be knowable again!

This second paper is titled "Black Holes prove that General Relativity is Wrong".

Here is the accepted definition of a Black Hole: "In the center of a black hole is a gravitational singularity, a one-dimensional point which contains a huge mass in an infinitely small space, where density and gravity become infinite and space-time curves infinitely, and where the laws of physics as we know them cease to operate." This is a scientific fairytale.

Firstly, this statement is not to imply that Relativity is Wrong, because as long as the speed of light is a constant, Relativity is true, only that it has been calculated wrong.

When Einstein published his theory in 1917 to expand on his famous E=mc² paper, discussed in my first lecture, it did not take long for scientists to hail his work as a theory of extraordinary beauty. That Einstein had built it with totally incomprehensible math helped it to survive even now as one of the top ten science hits. His concept that 'the fundamental interaction of gravitation is a result of spacetime being curved by mass and energy' was a perfect fit for the quantum world, where everything was mystical.

However, in the 1930’s, Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar, a talented astrophysicist student from India, who was later awarded the 1983 Nobel Prize, used Einstein’s field equations to calculate densities and accelerations inside a collapsing superstar. In this he showed that there was a singularity at the center of this star

Sadly for the truth, this discovery was laughed of by the astronomer Arthur Eddington. Eddington had famously proved Einstein's concept that light can bend twice as much as Newton's calculation by photographing the May 29, 1919 eclipse. (3 plates: 2 for Einstein; 1 for Newton!). (It is correct, but Miles Mathis has an easier way to calculate it without Einstein's complicated formula.) (See Solving and Arguing General Relativity Problems without the Tensor Calculus (In about 1/100th the time)

What what exactly is a singularity? In math it is simply a point where a function breaks down, such as 1/x when x gets close to zero. In physics it is a place where a novel such as "A Brief History of Time" by Stephen Hawking becomes reality and thus we have black holes. It used to be that a singularity would prove that a theory that caused it would be wrong. Einstein himself argued that a black hole could not exist, but he did not go back to fix his equations.

So how could theory be right if it it results in a singularity? Richard Feynman, known for his 'Feynman diagrams' of subatomic particles,

advocated the process of 'renormalization'. This is "a procedure common in quantum field theory by which divergent parts of a calculation, leading to nonsensical infinite results, are absorbed by redefinition into a few measurable quantities, so yielding finite answers.' How can patched up formulas of the theories be correct! A singularity is not an existence, it is a mistake.

It quite fitting that black holes are black because their existence is the result of so many erroneous formulas and theories. Of course, it is possible that gravity can prevent light from escaping from the center of a huge contracting star, but a star can never become a point because there is no such thing as a point in nature (A physical point has no dimensions. The statement that a black hole one dimension is absurd because even on a graph, the center is labeled as (0,0). In any case, the center of a back hole was always a 'point', 'hole' was a misnomer. To becoming infinitely small is still just very-very-small, infinity is unreachable.

All of these equations of something going to zero that Newton and eerybofy else uses are wrong because calculus is at root a differential and zero is not a differential . See A Redefinition of the Derivative and the Integral; why the calculus works and why it doesn't (Calculus Simplified)

The biggest problem with Science writers today is that they do not understand that 'Relativity' means relativity: it is only observational and measurable, not a theory of existence. It is not apply locally. You are sitting on a planet spinning and orbiting around the sun, etc, but nothing changes: you are not heavier or taller or younger, there is no relativity; but to an alien in a spaceship, it "looks" like you have changed.

Einstein's General Relativity shows that space-time is curved but that is the result of his math. See Problems with General Relativity: Curved Space is Unnecessary and the Inertial System is Ignored

I apologize that I have blown up your worm-hole spaceship engine, but perhaps you should ask why you want to travel to another place or universe that is inhabited by creatures who will inevitably be as imperfect as us.

See The Myth of the Black Hole

It is hoped that this brief paper will inspire you to read the papers that I have linked to here that will overturn physics from the ground up.
Miles Mathis is the author of these proofs.